華山論劍-專業案例挑戰/Case 2015-004 The answer 

華山論劍-專業案例挑戰/Case 2015-004

Date: 5 Apr. posted by 方律涵/湯道謙/曾政豪/李青泰/張吉仰/牟聯瑞醫師學術天地

Answer of Case 2015-004

Clinical Course:

Several examinations were performed per guideline (Algorithm 1). EGD showed gastritis and reflux esophagitis, grade A by LA classification with no luminal stenosis or extrinsic tumors. High esophageal wall tension and spiraling was noted throughout the esophagus. Barium esophagogram (figure 3) was then scheduled to evaluate possible esophageal motility disorder. Result showed corkscrew appearance with partial obstruction, which highly suggested esophageal motility disorders. To exclude secondary cause, Chest CT (figure 4) was arranged and showed only mild wall thickening at lower esophagus. For confirmative diagnosis, esophageal manometry (figure 5) was done under our arrangement, and measurement reports showed simultaneous contraction(>20% wet swallows), intermittent peristalsis, repetitive contraction(>3 peaks), and contraction duration> 6 secs. Results satisfy the conventional manometry criteria for diagnosis of diffuse esophageal spasm (table 2).

Several medications were prescribed, including smooth muscle relaxants (isosorbide-dinitrate, calcium channel blocker), low dose anti-depressant (sulpiride), proton pump inhibitor (esomeprazole). Exercise and lifestyle modifications were also recommended. However, patient did not experience significant improvement in symptoms. Patient was offered a chance for a new form of treatment. After detailed explanations of risks and benefits, the patient accepted a new kind of sumucosal tunneling technique: Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (P.O.E.M.) (figure 6) characterized by minimal invasive myotomy. Complications during procedure included pneumoperitoneum, pneumomediastinum and pneumoscrotum. Due to these intra-procedure complications, myotomy was only 80% completed. After the procedure, patient was transferred to ICU. Repeat EGD and esophagogram were checked and showed no esophageal mucosal tear or contrast leakage. After monitoring for several days, patient was discharged smoothly. Patient experienced much improvement in symptoms after the procedure.

Algorithm 1 approach to dysphagia (from Esophagus 5th edition)


Figure 3 Esophagogram: spiral shape with partial obstruction


Figure 4 Chest CT: slightly wall thickening of lower esophagus


Figure 5-1 Manometry


Figure 5-2 Manometry report


Figure 5-2 Manometry report


Table 2
Three most common diagnosis of primary esophageal motility disorders (Modified from Esophagus 5th edition)

Primary esophageal motility disorder

Neuromuscular dysfunction of dysphagia

Conventional Manometry Criteria

Achalasia

Impaired LES relaxation and distal aperistalsis

Absent distal peristalsis; Relaxation LES pressure < 8mmHg;Rest LES pressure < 45mmHg

Diffuse esophageal spasm

Normal contractions, but uncoordinated, simultaneous propagated

Simultaneous contractions (≥ 20% wet swallows); Intermittent peristalsis; Repetitive contractions(≥ 3 peaks); Duration> 6seconds

Hypertensive peristalsis (Nutcracker esophagus )

Excessive contractions, but a coordinated manner

Increased distal amplitude (mean pressure >220 mmHg); increased distal peristalsis duration (mean >6 sec)


Figure 6
Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy(POEM). By submucosal tunneling technique, operator use an endoscopy to create a mucosal flap and then perform myotomy. The procedure is minimally invasive in contrast to conventional surgery.